<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for ditoinfo in english</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danteregis.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danteregis.com</link>
	<description>talking about programming and computer stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 02:08:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rails Functional Testing of mime types other than HTML (XML, JSON etc) by Evan R. Murphy</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/12/rails-functional-testing-of-mime-types-other-than-html-xml-json-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-5729</link>
		<dc:creator>Evan R. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 02:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-5729</guid>
		<description>They must have fixed this issue. In Rails 3.0.9, I&#039;m finding that :format =&gt; &quot;json&quot; and :format =&gt; :json both work in functional tests.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They must have fixed this issue. In Rails 3.0.9, I&#8217;m finding that :format =&gt; &#8220;json&#8221; and :format =&gt; :json both work in functional tests.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rails Functional Testing of mime types other than HTML (XML, JSON etc) by Brent</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/12/rails-functional-testing-of-mime-types-other-than-html-xml-json-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-893</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 22:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-893</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting this! I googled [rails xml &quot;functional test&quot; 406] and found this, which was exactly my problem. Someone else had posted example code using the symbol.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting this! I googled [rails xml "functional test" 406] and found this, which was exactly my problem. Someone else had posted example code using the symbol.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how to install ruby on rails and lighttpd on ubuntu by Dante Regis</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2007/03/how-to-install-ruby-on-rails-and-lighttpd-on-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dante Regis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:40:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/how-to-install-ruby-on-rails-and-lighttpd-on-ubuntu/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because, when in a production environment, Rails caches the classes and views for better performance. So you must restart your server after you deploy a new version of the app. You can change that on the config/environments/production.rb file.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because, when in a production environment, Rails caches the classes and views for better performance. So you must restart your server after you deploy a new version of the app. You can change that on the config/environments/production.rb file.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on how to install ruby on rails and lighttpd on ubuntu by Dennis</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2007/03/how-to-install-ruby-on-rails-and-lighttpd-on-ubuntu/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 11:17:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/2007/03/06/how-to-install-ruby-on-rails-and-lighttpd-on-ubuntu/#comment-680</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this.
Was a big help.
But i&#039;ve still got a problem.
lighttpd doesn&#039;t refresh the pages when i edit something.
I have to restart it in order to see the changes.
Any idea what could cause this?
Thanks in advance. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this.<br />
Was a big help.<br />
But i&#8217;ve still got a problem.<br />
lighttpd doesn&#8217;t refresh the pages when i edit something.<br />
I have to restart it in order to see the changes.<br />
Any idea what could cause this?<br />
Thanks in advance. <img src='http://danteregis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rails Functional Testing of mime types other than HTML (XML, JSON etc) by Caio</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/12/rails-functional-testing-of-mime-types-other-than-html-xml-json-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Caio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Thanks!! This saved my day! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks!! This saved my day! <img src='http://danteregis.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by FactoryGirl has_many associations &#171; justsoftwareconsulting.com</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/11/factory-girl-and-has_many-has_many-through-associations/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>FactoryGirl has_many associations &#171; justsoftwareconsulting.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-323</guid>
		<description>[...] a classic example of an unanswered question. Poor Umar wants this very same answer. He gets 3 wrong answers [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a classic example of an unanswered question. Poor Umar wants this very same answer. He gets 3 wrong answers [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Dave Rogers</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/11/factory-girl-and-has_many-has_many-through-associations/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 18:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-99</guid>
		<description>I had a huge problem creating these associations correctly w/ factory_girl, I finally got it fixed with help, you can check it out here:  http://railsondave.blogspot.com/2009/05/creating-hasmany-through-factories-with.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a huge problem creating these associations correctly w/ factory_girl, I finally got it fixed with help, you can check it out here:  <a href="http://railsondave.blogspot.com/2009/05/creating-hasmany-through-factories-with.html" rel="nofollow">http://railsondave.blogspot.com/2009/05/creating-hasmany-through-factories-with.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Jay McGavren</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/11/factory-girl-and-has_many-has_many-through-associations/comment-page-1/#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay McGavren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-87</guid>
		<description>Umur,

I was able to associate the child objects properly by ensuring they were written to the database when defining the lazy attribute, like so:

user.groups {&#124;groups&#124; [Factory.create(:group)] }

(.create writes the group to the database and ensures it has an ID, which the association then picks up on.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umur,</p>
<p>I was able to associate the child objects properly by ensuring they were written to the database when defining the lazy attribute, like so:</p>
<p>user.groups {|groups| [Factory.create(:group)] }</p>
<p>(.create writes the group to the database and ensures it has an ID, which the association then picks up on.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Custom Bitmap Background on OpenOffice Impress 2.x by Sander</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2007/09/custom-bitmap-background-on-openoffice-impress-2x/comment-page-1/#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Sander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/2007/09/28/custom-bitmap-background-on-openoffice-impress-2x/#comment-57</guid>
		<description>OO 3.0 has indeed improved on this kind of stuff, you can now set a background picture doing richtclick=&gt;slide=&gt;set background picture for slide. yay : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OO 3.0 has indeed improved on this kind of stuff, you can now set a background picture doing richtclick=&gt;slide=&gt;set background picture for slide. yay : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Umur</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2008/11/factory-girl-and-has_many-has_many-through-associations/comment-page-1/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>Umur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/?p=85#comment-79</guid>
		<description>I simply tried the suggestion making
class User
   has_many :posts
class Post
   belongs_to :user

In the code above all groups end up with “user_id = nil”. Actually the factory creates the posts and the users. And the result is many unrelated posts and users.

Can we consider it a bug or missing feature of factory girl?
The one to many definition does not work:
user.groups {&#124;groups&#124; [groups.association(:group)]}</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I simply tried the suggestion making<br />
class User<br />
   has_many :posts<br />
class Post<br />
   belongs_to :user</p>
<p>In the code above all groups end up with “user_id = nil”. Actually the factory creates the posts and the users. And the result is many unrelated posts and users.</p>
<p>Can we consider it a bug or missing feature of factory girl?<br />
The one to many definition does not work:<br />
user.groups {|groups| [groups.association(:group)]}</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

