Comments for ditoinfo in english

Comment on Rails Functional Testing of mime types other than HTML (XML, JSON etc) by Caio

Caio — Wed, 06 Jan 2010 17:53:58 +0000

Thanks!! This saved my day!

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by FactoryGirl has_many associations « justsoftwareconsulting.com

FactoryGirl has_many associations « justsoftwareconsulting.com — Thu, 15 Oct 2009 19:52:39 +0000

[...] a classic example of an unanswered question. Poor Umar wants this very same answer. He gets 3 wrong answers [...]

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Dave Rogers

Dave Rogers — Sun, 24 May 2009 18:33:51 +0000

I had a huge problem creating these associations correctly w/ factory_girl, I finally got it fixed with help, you can check it out here: http://railsondave.blogspot.com/2009/05/creating-hasmany-through-factories-with.html

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Jay McGavren

Jay McGavren — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:28:22 +0000

Umur,

I was able to associate the child objects properly by ensuring they were written to the database when defining the lazy attribute, like so:

user.groups {|groups| [Factory.create(:group)] }

(.create writes the group to the database and ensures it has an ID, which the association then picks up on.)

Comment on Custom Bitmap Background on OpenOffice Impress 2.x by Sander

Sander — Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:16:59 +0000

OO 3.0 has indeed improved on this kind of stuff, you can now set a background picture doing richtclick=>slide=>set background picture for slide. yay : )

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Umur

Umur — Tue, 17 Mar 2009 11:17:24 +0000

I simply tried the suggestion making
class User
has_many :posts
class Post
belongs_to :user

In the code above all groups end up with “user_id = nil”. Actually the factory creates the posts and the users. And the result is many unrelated posts and users.

Can we consider it a bug or missing feature of factory girl?
The one to many definition does not work:
user.groups {|groups| [groups.association(:group)]}

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by dante regis

dante regis — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:57:00 +0000

I’m sure you couldn’t, and that’s not your fault. It’s not there. I found it on a blog, but since I posted a few days after reading it, I could not remember the source, for what I am sorry.

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by dante regis

dante regis — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:53:39 +0000

can you tell us how your relationships are defined in the models so we can help you better?

Comment on Factory Girl and has_many / has_many :through associations by Umur

Umur — Mon, 16 Mar 2009 02:23:37 +0000

I try your suggestion but…
All groups end up with “user_id = nil”
Using factory_girl 1.2.0

Comment on apt-get and dpkg log – undo changes by mavior

mavior — Wed, 11 Feb 2009 23:38:05 +0000

I would also give a try to http://mavior.eu/apt-log