<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ditoinfo in english &#187; firefox</title>
	<atom:link href="http://danteregis.com/category/firefox/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://danteregis.com</link>
	<description>talking about programming and computer stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:57:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Moving and using Firefox Plugins on Swiftfox</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2007/05/moving-and-using-firefox-plugins-on-swiftfox/</link>
		<comments>http://danteregis.com/2007/05/moving-and-using-firefox-plugins-on-swiftfox/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 02:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dante Regis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[howto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/2007/05/21/moving-and-using-firefox-plugins-on-swiftfox/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, have you ever heard of Swiftfox? If you are coming from google, probably yes. It is just like Firefox (the same source code) but it is compiled with optimizators for the major CPUs avaiable. So, it will perform better on your machine. It&#8217;s like having Firefox on Steroids. So, since it has the same [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, have you ever heard of Swiftfox? If you are coming from google, probably yes. It is just like Firefox (the same source code) but it is compiled with optimizators for the major CPUs avaiable. So, it will perform better on your machine. It&#8217;s like having Firefox on Steroids. So, since it has the same source code, you can use your existing extensions (and install new ones) as well as use your plugins. There&#8217;s an platform independent installer on the website, but if it does not import the plugins for you, or, for some reason, you have installed it using another method (like Automatix, or tarball), you can create soft links from your existing plugins to use them on swift fox.</p>
<p>1. Go to /usr/lib/firefox/plugins</p>
<p>2. Do a &#8216;ls -l&#8217;  so that you can see where the link points to</p>
<p>3. Now, create links on /opt/swiftfox/plugins to the original files</p>
<p>Tip: ln receives the target and then the name for the link (I always misplace them)</p>
<p>Example:</p>
<p>Giving ls -l you find out that the java plugin (firefox-javaplugin.so) is in /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so. So you do a</p>
<p>ln -s /etc/alternatives/firefox-javaplugin.so /opt/swiftfox/plugins/</p>
<p>Swiftfox will automatically use the new plugins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danteregis.com/2007/05/moving-and-using-firefox-plugins-on-swiftfox/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>firefox using less memory</title>
		<link>http://danteregis.com/2007/02/firefox-using-less-memory/</link>
		<comments>http://danteregis.com/2007/02/firefox-using-less-memory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 15:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dante Regis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[firefox]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ditoinfo.wordpress.com/2007/02/24/firefox-using-less-memory/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love Firefox! Using it since it&#8217;s early days, back in 2004, we did have time to talk and get to know each other. As any other love affair, there&#8217;s a thing I don&#8217;t like about FF: it&#8217;s memory use.
Sometimes I open like 70-80 tabs at once, on one or two windows. I&#8217;ve seen my [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Firefox! Using it since it&#8217;s early days, back in 2004, we did have time to talk and get to know each other. As any other love affair, there&#8217;s a thing I don&#8217;t like about FF: it&#8217;s memory use.</p>
<p>Sometimes I open like 70-80 tabs at once, on one or two windows. I&#8217;ve seen my memory use get up to 300MB. And I&#8217;m sure some of you have used even more. Well, there are a few things we can do about that, and they are all on your about:config page.<span id="more-8"></span></p>
<p>First, head to the about:config page as you would do with any other web page, like Google. It is a special page, and your browser will change a bit, to display a list of internal configurations. On the left you find the name of the property and on the rightmost column, it&#8217;s value. Bold lines have been changed from it&#8217;s default.</p>
<p>If you find here an option that isn&#8217;t listed, right click a blank spot of the page and choose the New Option item menu (it&#8217;s a free translation, my FF is in brazilian portuguese), choosing the adequate data type.</p>
<p>Now to the options:</p>
<p><a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.sessionhistory.max_total_viewers" target="_blank"><strong> browser.sessionhistory.max_total_viewers</strong></a>: this setting tells FF how many pages it should keep in memory already parsed. It&#8217;s different from the disk cache, that keeps only the files, wich still need to be parsed. -1 indicates FF will set a value based on your memory size. I like to keep it at &#8220;1&#8243; or &#8220;2&#8243;. Each page uses around 4MB of memory, and this setting works on each tab. So, if you set it to &#8220;3&#8243; and have 10 tabs opened, you will have 30 pages on memory.</p>
<p><strong><a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Config.trim_on_minimize" target="_blank">config.trim_on_minimize</a>:</strong> this settings tells FF if it should allow Windows to &#8220;steal&#8221; it&#8217;s memory when minimized for a certain amount of time. Setting this value to <strong>true</strong> will enable it at the cost that Firefox will take longer to be restored from the taskbar.</p>
<p><a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.cache.memory.enable" target="_blank"> <strong>browser.cache.memory.enable</strong></a>: this setting allows images, chrome and secure pages to be cached in memory. It is turned on by default, and I like to keep it that way. It affects the next setting which is</p>
<p><a href="http://kb.mozillazine.org/Browser.cache.memory.capacity" target="_blank"><strong>browser.cache.memory.capacity</strong></a>: it tells how much memory should be used on the items of the previous setting. On a  1GB systems, it defaults to 32MB. Like on max_total_viewers, -1 means that FF will try and find the &#8220;best&#8221; value for you. I keep it at 4096 (4MB).</p>
<p>Keep in mind, though, that these settings <strong>are not magic</strong>, and you will still have memory problems with Firefox, only less often.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://danteregis.com/2007/02/firefox-using-less-memory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
